Article:

The zero of life/existence dimension of any reason concept
https://kyonissho.com/kyos-blog/blog/2021/07/15/the-zero-of-life-existence-dimension-of-any-reason-concept/

Update:

from

Fig.4.2:
The inverse (at the right side) of the third set is compared with the first set and the second set as the requirement of {a-priori<<, a-posteriori from generation} of the two Bibles and {a-posteriori<<, a-priori from nothingness} of Taoism.
Here a-priori means "existing before experience" and a-posteriori means "existing after experience."

to

Fig.4.2:
The inverse (at the right side) of the third set is compared with the first set and the second set as the requirement of {a-priori<<, a-posteriori from generation} of the two Bibles and {a-posteriori<<, a-priori from nothingness} of Taoism.
Here a-priori means "existing before experience" and a-posteriori means "existing after experience."
The peculiarities of the first set and the second set make
(a) [{generality⇦, a-priori → a-posteriorit}, {generality⇦, a-posteriori → a-priori}set]interval,
and the third set makes with (a)
(b) [generality⇦, generality⇦]interval → ubiquitous antecedent,
then (a) and (b) make
(c) [ubiquitous_transcendency_(reason concept, love, freedom and eternal life), ⇨any_pecuriality]interval → force,
(c)'s another expression is
(d) [[ ], ⇨any_peculiarity], then [[ ]⇦, any force].
⇦ and ⇨ mean reflexive here, and → means implication of logic, [ ] means omission including any omitted verb.

(C) Copyright 2025 Kiyom Nishio (Kyo Nissho). All rights reserved.