As considering derivatives,

Fig.1:
When a succeeded investment exists,

Fig.2.0 (1):
... another investment model is designed based on the succeeded model,

Fig.2.0 (2):
Fig.2.2 is quick to understand, but as text,
the total amount of the 69 countries' each small amount investment × 1.1 is included to another +100%, then the original 100% + 100% = 200% → ×2.0 of the probability. Another invested 100%'s money amount of the represented achievement is the derivative's funds including by the third world, and the derivative's 100% total interest money will obtained only by one winner, other loser will lost e.g. ×10 of market scale and ×3 of leverage, totally they should pay 3×10 of their invested money. But the winner becomes finally zero.

Fig.2.1:
Mod is modular arithmetic to seek any same shape.
0.1x and 6.9x have a same shape.

Fig.2.2:
(1 + 1 = 2) and (69 + 69 = 138) have a same shape.
69 countries had a same shape with 1. But if 69 future potential in green area can make a product or service, and if the total amount 1 of interest can't reach the total 69, the maximum pressure to realize 69 will be ×69, or 69×3×10 = 2070 for a single country. This maximum size isn't included to the green area.

About those who buy a mortal engage,
(a) they promise another market for the original development which isn't a mortal engage,
(b) just one of them will be the winner, in other words, they are not supporter of each other for the another development,
(c) the sum of the interests themselves to which they joined will not increase and decrease, i.e. ±0.
(d) the total future amount forces the competitors to develop themselves, but the original model is out of them.
(e) (a)'s original development will sell products or services to (d), but (d)s have been exhausted of money, or devastated.

Any derivative is a money game "of plural people, by competition, for future ±0, in all the risks."

There can be many designs of derivative except fig.2.2, although Trump's may be the final one, it seems (0.1 × 10) may become (0.0 × 10 = 0 for the competitors, ×10 is Trump's, there should be =10 as the total).

-

For example, The geometric Amazon is called as Earth's lung, but Amazon's forest is burnt for slash-and-burn farming if coffee beans should be harvested for the double amount to a derivative investment, then Brazil should ask CO2 emission right's deal to the world, because the climate for farming should be observed.
When the original 100% becomes a crisis, the voice is heard as "Greenland is for sale! Canada is 51st State of USA! Gaza will be a Riviera for the opened gate to Mediterranean Sea for the doubled amount espresso as your [above] interest based on the paied lives of Hamas, Palestinian and Israeli [as above ×3×10×69]! Buy and sell!"

All paid lives for espresso, and it will be Canada,
of the ethnic cleansing with the straight armed salute.

Fig.3:
... other investments are collected from e.g. 69 countries for the model, but just one country will win the money based on probability over the statistics for development. But no countries has achieved e.g. another tech giant in their country, but China except the 69 countries.

According to Bloomberg on May 15 2020, the derivative market scale is 640 trillion dollar.
LIBOR (The London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) was phased out at 2021 which was the index of the 200 trillion dollar of derivative. Then the world total GDP was about 100 trillion dollar.
The world money amount in the last 2023 is about 1,213 trillion dollar.

Crazy numbers are there and here of you. Roughly,
640 (derivative in 2020) : 100 (the world GDP in 2021) : 1,213 (the money amount in 2023).
Although LIBOR was phased out the madness.

And according to some news report which I read, Wall Street's traders who have their designed mortgages (mortal engages) exit (leave there) after selling out the model and deals. In the last year, 50% Americans might not settle their debt.
The mortal engages are seemingly bought by non-banks. And if it is true, the international mortal engages are dealt by non-banks in America, to Americans.
As usual, the absolute benefit of economy may be 30%, and the tariff raises 15% of (10% → 25%), then (30% : 15%) = (2 : 1) = 50%. Americans must get the productivity 2 times higher, if the distribution's center point is 50%, (50% higher of 50% is +25%) → 75% in the next distribution. This means "all Americans must be at the 75% distribution center of the entire world over the mortal engages.
The danger will raise 25% more by the 25% tariffs. If Americans incomes are regarded in a standard distribution, the 25% shifted distribution center will may make 1/2330 ≒ 0.0429% survival rate in the world, i.e. the rate will may raise from 50% to 99.9571%.

I'm not sure why President Trump does this.
(1) Brutal settlement of the globalism? "Destroy!, buy and sell [with the straight armed salute]!"
(2) Because Donald J Trump is the master of real estate deal of domestic economy, not of global economy?
(3) Another?

I can't agree the policy of "buy and sell Greenland or Gaza as Riviela, get Canada for next mortal engages", I believe it will be beyond Ukraine war and Hamas-Israel war.

Fig.4:
Logically, the antonym of "buy" is "sell."
"I buy Gaza" or "I buy Greenland" means "I will sell Gaza or Greenland."
"Canada is 51st State" means "Canada is 51st real estate for mortgage (mortal + engage), of which (Canada) the great potential will be near USA."

Above explanation is assumption. Therefore you may wait the truth to be given after the dealing, and if it will be regarded as above assumption, then you will have no time for the annihilation of entire world.

But originally and exactly, originally and exactly sure, there should not exist "buying/selling another sovereignty."

(C) Copyright 2025 Kiyom Nishio (Kyo Nissho). All rights reserved.