Article:

I’ve planned 300 hours for the details of Wiles’ Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem.

Update:

from

I’ve shown interval -> m with a geometric spin figure, the expression becomes simple, especially F2 is very special and important to discover.
Although, if you need an algebraic expression, it is …
when c is a combined number, Fc has a Galois’ imaginary number. If p - 1 = a and p - 1 + 1 = b, and a and b are evaluated as same rank, although (p - 1)’s next is p. But p - 1 + 1 isn’t c, c is a combined number. If a is calculated as p - 1, then b is null, but b’s next is 0. Or if b is calculated as p - 1, a is null, but a is regarded as having a same complement of {0, 10, 100, … , ∞} with b.

to

I’ve shown interval -> m with a geometric spin figure, the expression becomes simple, especially F2 is very special and important to discover.
Although, if you need an algebraic expression, it is …
when c is a combined number, Fc has a Galois’ imaginary number. If p - 1 = a and p - 1 + 1 = b, and a and b are evaluated as same rank, although (p - 1)’s next is p. But p - 1 + 1 isn’t c, c is a combined number. If a is calculated as p - 1, then b can’t decide number, but b’s next is 0. Or if b is calculated as p - 1, a can’t decide number, but a is regarded as having a same complement of {0, 10, 100, … , ∞} with b.

and

URL:

https://kyonissho.com/kyos-blog/blog/2023/01/16/ive-planned-300-hours-for-the-detail-of-wiles-proof-of-fermats-last-theorem/

(C) Copyright 2023 Kyo Nissho (Kiyom Nishio). All rights reserved.